top of page
Writer's pictureKhalajah Parsons

Injustice in Plain Sight: Uncovering the Double Standards in Law Enforcement and Government Accountability

Updated: Nov 20

Today, the issues surrounding police violence and the systemic targeting of Black individuals are an undeniable injustice. We continually see heartbreaking incidents where unarmed Black men, women, and even children lose their lives due to police action. Each tragic event raises important questions about accountability and the flaws within our justice system. Why are many police officers not held accountable for their actions? What does this reveal about the fairness we expect from our institutions?


The phrase "I feared for my life" often becomes a catch-all excuse, allowing officers to act with little fear of retaliation. This raises critical questions: Is this how we define justice? Are we as a society really okay with letting law enforcement operate as if they are above scrutiny?


The Alarming Statistics of Injustice


The statistics around police violence are staggering. Data from the Mapping Police Violence project shows that in 2020, Black individuals were three times more likely to be killed by police compared to white individuals. Additionally, nearly 25% of those killed were unarmed, which demonstrates a disturbing pattern of excessive force. Despite these alarming numbers, many of these cases do not lead to prosecutions. This lack of accountability perpetuates cycles of mistrust in communities already affected by violence.


Moreover, a study found that over 99% of police killings from 2013 to 2019 did not result in charges against the officers involved. This creates a troubling narrative, allowing law enforcement to act without significant consequences, while entire communities bear the scars of these injustices.


The Question of Accountability of Injustice


The double standards in our legal system become painfully clear when looking at how law enforcement personnel are treated compared to average citizens. For instance, a white officer involved in the death of a Black citizen often receives explanations that a jury would reject. This implies that the justice system is disguised behind legal loopholes. In contrast, when a Black officer is involved in a fatal incident, they often face immediate public outcry and severe consequences.


Take the case of former Officer Michael Slager, who was charged with murder after fatally shooting Walter Scott, a Black man, in 2015. Slager's actions were heavily scrutinized, and he was convicted and sentenced to 20 years in prison. This stark contrast highlights how race influences the perception of accountability within the judicial system.


Immunity for Prosecutors & Injustice


Another issue lies with the near-impunity prosecutors enjoy regarding law enforcement accountability. Prosecutors are responsible for upholding justice but often face minimal repercussions when they violate rights or withhold evidence. For example, in a recent case, prosecutors managed to avoid disciplinary action despite acknowledging errors in handling the evidence.


This culture of leniency within the prosecutorial system perpetuates systemic injustices. Misconduct claims against prosecutors rarely become investigations, reinforcing a system where bending the rules is acceptable. The result is a damaging environment that diminishes the very idea of accountability.


The Conviction Rate Paradox


A perplexing feature of our legal system is the remarkably high conviction rates often claimed by prosecutors. On average, many prosecutors earn conviction rates exceeding 95%. The disparity is striking, especially when defense attorneys struggle to achieve similar outcomes.


An example involves a New Jersey defense attorney who had a high winning record and faced accusations of misconduct simply because statically remarkable performance raised questions. This contrast highlights that government officials tend to be presumed innocent until proven guilty, while defense lawyers are under constant scrutiny.


A Changing Standard of Conviction


Over the years, the threshold for what it means to be guilty has shifted dramatically. The original principle of proving guilt beyond a reasonable doubt once required hard evidence, such as a weapon or a credible witness. Today, the bar has lowered, particularly concerning police actions, where narratives often bend reality to protect officers. The burden of proof appears to shift, offering them protection and distancing them from accountability measures that should govern their actions.


Building Awareness for Systematic Change


As citizens, we must critically evaluate these discrepancies within our law enforcement and judicial systems. By exposing these patterns, we can ask why only certain officers face consequences. This awareness is crucial in advocating for a more just society where transparency and accountability rule over discrimination and bias.


Highlighting these issues plays a vital role in the quest for a fair system. Keeping the conversation around police accountability alive is essential. It is imperative that we demand comprehensive reforms that bring all law enforcement officers, irrespective of their race, to the same standard of accountability.


Justice and Accountability Matter


The foundation of any society rests on justice and accountability. When we allow double standards to dictate how laws are enforced, we risk normalizing injustice.


As we continue to witness terrible acts of violence justified by those meant to protect us, we must remain vigilant and not become desensitized. It is crucial for individuals to question the system, examine its practices, and understand the ramifications of these injustices within our communities.


In this pursuit of true justice, our voices are incredibly powerful. Together, we can promote a world where accountability is not optional but a guaranteed right for everyone.


Police Accountability
Demonstrators protesting police violence and demanding justice for victims.

Vigilance is key in examining these issues. Awareness is only the beginning; real change will come from persistent advocacy and action to create a fair and just legal framework. The time to get involved is now.


See some of our other blogs on reform:



5 views0 comments

Recent Posts

See All

Be Aware

Comments

Rated 0 out of 5 stars.
No ratings yet

Add a rating
bottom of page